Cambridge could soon expand the use of automated speed enforcement with the potential purchase three portable speed cameras.
The cameras could be moved to different locations around the city as traffic concerns change.
The proposal was discussed during the latest meeting of the Cambridge City Commissioners.
Police say the cameras would be used mainly in school zones and neighborhoods where residents have complained about speeding.
Under Maryland law, there would be a 30-day warning period before any tickets are issued. Drivers would receive warnings during that time.
After the warning period ends, citations could be issued only to drivers traveling at least 12 miles per hour over the posted speed limit.
Police say the portable cameras would give the city more flexibility than previous speed camera programs.
The devices could be moved from one location to another based on complaints from residents and traffic safety concerns.
Cameras could be placed in school zones while children are present and then relocated to other areas where speeding has become a problem.
Commissioners asked several questions about the proposal. They wanted to know where the cameras would be placed, how much the program would cost, and how residents would be involved before any final decision is made.
Some commissioners said public input will be important. They noted that automated traffic enforcement often generates strong opinions. They said residents should understand how the program would work before cameras are installed.
The discussion also looked back at Cambridge's previous experience with speed cameras. Police said the new proposal is different because the cameras would not remain in one location. Instead, they could be moved to areas with the greatest need.
Commissioners also discussed the financial side of the program. Police cautioned against viewing the cameras as a source of revenue. They said the primary goal is to reduce speeding and improve safety. At the same time, citation revenue could help pay for the program if enough violations are recorded.
City leaders said they have a responsibility to respond to residents who report ongoing speeding problems. They also said school zones would likely be among the first locations considered because state law specifically allows automated speed enforcement in those areas.
No action was taken. The proposal remains under review as city staff gathers more information on costs, vendors, and implementation. Commissioners will make a final decision later.